1) Isn’t it only right-wing Tories and Ukip who want to leave the EU?
No. In the media the referendum campaign has been completely dominated by right-wing, pro-big business politicians. The voice of working class people has not been heard. In fact, however, a number of trade unions - including the militant transport workers’ union the RMT - are campaigning for exit. So is the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) of which the Socialist Party is a part.
Our campaign has nothing in common with the right-wing nationalist politicians who speak for exit in the media. In fact TUSC is running a campaign to demand that none of the official ’leave’ campaigns receive state funding to peddle their right-wing nationalist reasons for exit.
In the last European referendum campaign, back in 1975, socialists like Tony Benn were prominent campaigners for voting for exit. They understood that the EU (then called the Common Market) was exactly that - an agreement between the different capitalist classes of Europe in order to create the largest possible market and maximise their profits. Since then a succession of EU treaties have further enshrined privatisation and attacks on workers’ rights into the fabric of the EU.
It is only necessary to look at the way the institutions of the EU have treated the people of Greece - forcing endless austerity on them which has lowered incomes by an average of one third and led to mass unemployment - to see that the EU acts in the interests of the 1% not the 99%.
2) You say that the EU enshrines privatisation and attacks on workers’ rights but isn’t it better to stay in and try to reform it?
Some politicians who agree with many of the criticisms of the EU listed above (Green MP Caroline Lucas, for example) say that it is better to stay in the EU and try to reform it. The question they can’t answer, however, is how the EU could be reformed.
Voters across Europe get to vote for MEPs who sit in the European Parliament; but that is an almost completely powerless body. Of course, when socialists are elected to the European Parliament they have been able to use it as a platform to campaign in defence of workers’ rights. But it is not the European Parliament but the European Council that takes the vast majority of EU decisions.
The European Council is made up of the heads of government of the 28 nation states of the EU - the EU really is a capitalists’ club. The governments of Europe have no interest in handing some of their power to the European Parliament.
It can’t be totally excluded that a powerful European-wide mass movement could force them to do so - but a movement that powerful could also achieve far more than the reforming the EU, it could put a socialist federation of Europe on the agenda.
3) But isn’t it more internationalist to be in the EU together with other nations?
The EU is not internationalist. On the contrary, it is ’Fortress Europe’, doing everything it can - including allowing refugees to drown in the Mediterranean - in order to prevent those fleeing for their lives from Syria and elsewhere being able to enter the EU.
Nor does not it foster European solidarity within the EU; rather it increases tensions between different nations. It is a capitalist project attempting to impose unity between nations from above, in the interests of the capitalist classes of Europe, particularly those from the most powerful nations.
Over the last eight years the institutions of the EU - the hated ’troika’ - have imposed terrible austerity andprivatisation on the economically weaker countries of the EU - above all Greece, but also Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Latvia, Romania and others. The governments of these and other EU countries have used EU rules as the excuse for the misery they have imposed on their populations. The inevitable result is an increase of national feelings as people rebel against endless EU austerity.
Real internationalism is workers’ solidarity across Europe. Working class people have huge common interests. We are facing the same fight against low pay, casualisation, cuts and privatisation in every country of Europe. Successful movements in one country would have huge support, and be emulated, across the continent. That is why the institutions of the EU were desperate to force the left-led Syriza government in Greece to its knees in order to demonstrate to workers in other EU countries that there was no alternative to endless austerity.
Under huge pressure from world capitalism the Syriza government capitulated - and is now implementing further savage austerity - to which the Greek working class have responded with general strike action.
But it didn’t have to be that way. If the Syriza government had stood firm and implemented socialist policies it would have been kicked out of the Eurozone, and even the EU. But, by showing a real alternative to austerity, it would have inspired millions of workers across Europe to fight for socialist policies in their own countries.
Socialists are internationalists; we want the maximum possible unity across Europe. But this is only possible on the basis of democratic socialism, eradicating poisonous divisions through real working class internationalism, leading to a voluntary socialist federation across the continent.
4) Doesn’t the EU Social Chapter give workers more rights?
For decades now the majority of trade union leaders in Britain have argued that the European Social Chapter provides important protection for workers in Britain.
In reality the Social Chapter, while it potentially gave some extra legal protection on certain issues, was never much more than a fig leaf to disguise the reality of theEuropean Union as an employers’ union.
What protects workers in Britain - and in other countries - is not the European Social Chapter but our collective strength. If, over the last decades, the trade union leaders had led a determined struggle against austerity and privatisation, we could have won far more than the few crumbs provided by the Social Chapter.
Let’s remember Major’s Tory government was allowed to simply ’opt out’ of the Social Chapter when it was first introduced. When Labour was elected in 1997 they opted into the Social Chapter. However, Britain’s anti-trade union laws, both the already draconian existing laws and the even more brutal ones currently going through parliament, are not deemed to have contravened the Social Chapter.
And after many years of neo-liberal EU treaties and endless austerity, even the fig leaf of the Social Chapter is now in tatters. EU member states that have been ’bailed out’ by the troika have suffered the biggest fall in collective bargaining rights in the world. According to the International Labour Organisation (the ILO) collective bargaining rights have fallen by an average of 21% across the ten EU countries hardest hit by the economic crisis, and have fallen by a massive 63% in Romania and 45% in Greece.
5) What would exit mean for workers in Britain who are citizens of other EU countries?
The Socialist Party is campaigning for the right of all those working in Britain to be able to continue to do so with full legal rights. We understand, however, that many workers from other EU countries are worried that a vote to leave might put their rights in danger.
In fact, in the short term their rights would not change. For two years, or until UK has negotiated a leaving deal with the EU, the existing situation would remain.
It is not likely a deal would be negotiated quickly. Losing the referendum would be a disaster for Cameron and would almost certainly mean he would be forced to resign. The Tories could split. It is even possible that they could be forced from power.
There would therefore be plenty of time for the workers’ movement to organise against any threat to EU citizens in Britain. It is possible that - if the government was to fall - a Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour Party could come to power.
It is important therefore that Jeremy Corbyn makes clear that his government would defend the rights of all EU citizens. And of course EU workers who are members of trade unions will have far greater protection in the workplace than they get from EU law.
Even if the Tories remain in power, it is not at all certain that a post-exit government would want to threaten the rights to work in Britain of EU citizens. There are two million British nationals settled in other EU countries who could then be threatened with expulsion from their country of residence.
In addition British capitalism has used super-exploited EU workers as a means to try and lower wages of all workers in Britain. The capitalist class would like this to continue.
However, inside or outside of the EU, the Tory government is attempting to increase the exploitation of EU workers by cutting their rights to claim state benefits. In doing this they are attempting to divide and rule - falsely laying the blame for austerity at the door of migrants.
The workers’ movement needs to counter this by explaining that it is only big business that gains when we are divided. When workers from Eastern Europe are paid less than the rate for the job it is the bosses that gain. The only solution to this is a united struggle for all workers to get the rate for the job - with a £10 hour minimum wage.
This fight also has to defend the right of EU workers to claim benefits when they need to. In fact workers from Eastern Europe are less likely to claim benefits than those who were born here (6.6% compared to 16%) but if those workers don’t have the right to claim when they need to it will make it easier for big business to force them to work for lower wages, strengthening the ’race to the bottom’ for us all.
6) So if socialists should support leaving the EU why is Jeremy Corbyn voting to remain in?
In the last referendum on Europe, in 1975, Jeremy Corbyn voted for exit. During his leadership campaign last summer he refused to promise to call for a Remain vote, instead suggesting a conference of the workers’ movement to discuss a position.
Once he was elected leader of the Labour Party, however, he came under enormous pressure from the right wing of the Labour Party - and from the capitalist class - to call for a vote for Remain. Shadow Foreign Minister Hilary Benn, before he tried to blackmail Corbyn over Syria, threatened to resign unless Corbyn buckled on the issue of the EU. Unfortunately, he did buckle.
If Jeremy Corbyn was heading up a left exit campaign, it would have transformed the debate. The possibility of Leave winning and the Tories being evicted from power would have been far greater.
Instead, unfortunately, Labour is largely trailing behind the Tories. Alan Johnson MP, who is heading the ’Labour in for Britain’ campaign, even said that he wanted to prevent Cameron having to resign!
7) Are you saying that - unless we leave the EU - it will never be possible to implement socialist policies in Britain?
No, of course not. The Socialist Party opposes the EU because of its laws and institutions but they could not stop a determined workers’ government supported by a mass movement from carrying out socialist policies. However, they are another hurdle to overcome, with real consequences for the day-to-day struggles to defend working class interests.
Here are a few reasons that socialists should vote to leave the EU:
• TTIP is just the latest secret trade deal negotiated by the EU. Like those that have gone before it institutionalises privatisation, including of health services. EU treaties also drive forward privatisation - including of postal services and transport services.
• EU laws forbid nationalisation (or even state subsidies to companies!). Jeremy Corbyn’s call for renationalisation of the railways which is supported by over 70% of the population, for example, is illegal under EU law.
• EU treaties have systematically undermined workers’ rights. It promotes zero-hour contracts, low pay and ’flexible’ working as part of its structural adjustment programme. The posted workers’ directive, for example, does not recognise collective agreements between workers and employers and ’in a race to the bottom’ allows businesses to employ workers’ on worse pay and conditions than the minimum for the industry concerned in that particular country.
• EU laws demand permanent austerity from all EU governments. They include strict rules limiting public spending and government borrowing.